Philosophy - Peter van Inwagen Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Philosophy - Peter van Inwagen - Essay Example Without this attraction, the world would spiral to a halt, and the seemingly expansive choice in orientation would ridicule not just the concept of marriage but the process of evolution as well. Even if morals were expelled momentarily while this belief was expounded, it would simply transpire that the belief itself is self-explanatory, the consequence of straight attractions would always augment in favor of humanity. Maria on the other hand is of the impression that choosing a sexual partner is not a matter of naturalism as dictated by society but what occurs naturally within one’s own mind. The choice of orientations being given to an individual of sound mind and conscious decision-making prowess allows one to hold the self as the profound dictator of one’s own desires. It negates societal stigma and in itself forms the belief that the preference of orientation should be the choice of the individual and not the choice of the State. Maria’s belief is in itself t he reason of her belief. 2) I reject the notion that even though equally strong positives and negatives of pertaining to a strict orientation dictated by society exist in the real world, I should not believe in the fact that one orientation should be deemed natural and the others unnatural. It is true that the minority of cases of same sex marriage that surfaced in California right after the law was passed do pertain to a suppressed sociological regime that exists within the murky shadows of society, it does not acknowledge the fact that personal inclinations are not exactly the best form of judgments for the entire society. Consider the use of drugs, for example. While it is evident that the proliferation of drugs is a crime worthy of... The researcher of this essay expresses his belief on sexual orientation and states that sexual orientations should not be debatable and an indelible structure should be adhered to that surpasses all individual desires in favor of what is natural and readily admissible by a given society, in lieu of personal inclinations that give rise to stigmas and increased controversies. This belief was held based on evidential consequences of unnatural mating. Indeed, being straight is a recognized normality in the world of today and could be deemed a consequence of determinism. However, with the increasing span of global human rights surpassing sovereign state laws and personal inclinations of societies, and in the same way the citizens of the United Kingdom may adhere to the European Court of Human Rights to address domestic issues, a citizen of Massachusetts may be able to contract and perform a marriage with his lover of the same sex. However, seeing as how unnatural and seemingly undesirable the concept of same sex marriage appears to the researcher, he can adduce to my belief the fact that the majority of Americans are still in opposition to the legalization of gay marriage. Both beliefs can be deemed as right even though both carry their own insight and consequently their own conclusion which is why they co-exist concurrently, giving ample credit to the notion that both sides are equally weighty. However, it is true that science may allow human cultivation to reach new proportions of control over the upcoming population.